Main thing I would add to look for and evaluate when looking at monitors is also its display panel type: Be ready to spend quite some time to setup everything correctly Regarding curved/not curved I don't think there's much difference. Sounds stupid, but you should also check if the outputs of your card match the inputs of the monitors (dp, hdmi). There are calculators online and I'd suggest to do some testing before choosing between 27'' and 32''. The goal is to have 180fov and in case of 27'' is around 53-55cm from the main monitor with side angles of 60deg. Regarding the size, I think you should based your decision also on how far you're going to sit from the center monitor and the angles you'll have on the side monitors. * ACC runs decently, hitting 40-50fps high settings * AC runs perfectly as well, 100+fps everything maxed out * rFactor2 runs perfectly, 80-100fps everything maxed out I don't think my system would be able to run decently 1440p or even 1080p 144Hz without turning off details (it depends on the game, of course). Other tips and experiences are more than welcome cause it's pretty difficult to choose without ever seen/experienced a triple monitor setup. Also with the future in my mind regarding PC upgrades (currently not in the planning because its a lot of money ) Should i go for 1080p or 1440p.įor example: If i got the 1440p 144hz version but the gpu can't put out the 144hz on 1440p but only 100fps etc will that be waste of money and would 1080p be better for the monitor? Or is it fine to get lower but keep the 1440p just in case of possible future updates?Ĭurrently i am using my 21:9 tv for all my gaming on 2560x1080 resolution.īut no idea if the current GPU will do the 1440p fine with high settings (for lower settings/graphics i can switch to my VR). So i guess 27" monitor would be a nice format.īut there is also the resolution question. With this i can get the screen close and just above/in front of the wheel base. It will be mounted on the sim-lab triple mount (also need to buy that one) There are so many options to get in count. But now looking for monitors and which to choose. It's an expected flow for HTTP traffic these days.Thinking of buying a triple screen setup. This is one area where protocols are being abused in the name of optimization. In this case, the 185 host is trying to be nice about it, but the 172 host is all I'm done, go away.Īs a network security administrator the prevalence of RST packets in flows like these stands out as network anomalies. For HTTP connections which are notoriously slow (which is to say, have a foot-tapping human often waiting for a page to render while the browser deals with 50+ asset requests), little speed tweaks are how anything gets done on time. It's a rude way to do it, but HTTP can get away with it since data-transfer has two flows and if the second flow is done (the server response) the whole thing is done. However, TCP has another way to tear down a connection, and it's faster than this stately procedure. Steps 2 and 3 are often done at the same time, for a FIN/ACK packet. According to The TCP Guide on terminations, the usual order of events is:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |